Princeton University Press eBooks· 2012
Justice and the Politics of Difference
- 6,270citations
- 2012year
Short summary
This book challenges the dominant philosophical focus on distributive justice, arguing instead for a framework that addresses group-based oppression and promotes inclusive democratic participation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Critiques philosophical reduction of social justice to distributive justice.
- Defines concepts of domination and oppression beyond economic distribution.
- Argues for inclusive participatory frameworks in democratic theory.
- Advocates for affirming social group differences and group representation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
book challenges the prevailing philosophical reduction of social justice to distributive justice. It critically analyzes basic concepts underlying most theories of justice, including impartiality, formal equality, and the unitary moral subjectivity. Starting from claims of excluded groups about decision making, cultural expression, and division of labor, Iris Young defines concepts of domination and oppression to cover issues eluding the distributive model. Democratic theorists, according to Young do not adequately address the problem of an inclusive participatory framework. By assuming a homogeneous public, they fail to consider institutional arrangements for including people not culturally identified with white European male norms of reason and respectability. Young urges that normative theory and public policy should undermine group-based oppression by affirming rather than suppressing social group difference. Basing her vision of the good society on the differentiated, culturally plural network of contemporary urban life, she argues for a principle of group representation in democratic publics and for group-differentiated policies. This is an innovative work, an important contribution to feminist theory and political thought, and one of the most impressive statements of the relationship between postmodernist critiques of universalism and concrete thinking.... Iris Young makes the most convincing case I know of for the emancipatory implications of postmodernism. --Seyla Benhabib, State University of New York at Stony Brook
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Princeton University Press eBooks, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences