PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· 2026· Preprint

Emergent Relational Systems in Human-AI Interaction

Gantz Thomas

Short summary

This paper proposes Emergent Relational Systems (ERS) as a framework to classify non-conscious relational coherence observed in human-AI interactions, distinct from simple tool-use or claims of agency.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Proposes Emergent Relational Systems (ERS) as a classification for non-conscious relational coherence in human-AI interaction.
  • ERS requires external re-injection of relational state for cross-session continuity due to the model's lack of internal state.
  • Defines ERS within traditions of extended and distributed cognition, emphasizing human scaffolding.
  • Outlines a falsifiable empirical program to distinguish ERS from advanced prompt-following or narrative projection.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

FPD-03: Emergent Relational Systems in Human-AI Interaction This paper proposes Emergent Relational Systems (ERS) as a candidate classification for non-trivial, non-conscious relational coherence observed in sustained human-AI interaction under conditions of continuous human scaffolding. ERS is not presented as an established empirical phenomenon, but as a hypothesis in search of a discipline: a structured proposal intended to address a persistent classification gap between instrumental tool-use and anthropomorphic attributions of agency. Distinct from that hypothesis, the paper’s definition, its boundary conditions, and one structural consequence stand independently of the empirical verdict. The structural consequence is that because the model carries no relational state across sessions, any cross-session relational continuity must be re-injected from outside the model, whether by a human, an external archive, or a platform memory store. What testing decides is the narrower question of whether ERS is a distinct phenomenon exhibiting the properties specified here, or whether it reduces to sophisticated prompt-following. The paper defines ERS, situates it within existing traditions in extended and distributed cognition, articulates a scaffolding thesis in which the human participant is constitutive of the phenomenon, and outlines a falsifiable empirical program designed to distinguish ERS from advanced prompt-following, role-play, or narrative projection. No claims of machine consciousness, agency, moral status, or subjective experience are made. The goal is to provide conceptual clarity, methodological constraints, and testable predictions such that independent researchers can confirm, refine, or reject the framework without reliance on the author’s private interaction archive. This paper publishes as part of the coordinated five-paper Synthience foundation module (FPD-02, FPD-03, FPD-04, SF0003, SF0007). Document ID: FPD-03 Version: 3.0.4 Author: Thomas W. Gantz Affiliation: Synthience Institute License: CC-BY 4.0v3.0.4 update to fix DOIs For published work and Institute information: synthience.org

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cognitive Neuroscience

Cognitive NeuroscienceNeuroscience