JAMA Network Open· 2026Q1
Preterm Risk Factors, Epigenetic Age, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Epigenetic age acceleration, a measure of biological aging, was linked to better cognitive and motor outcomes in preterm infants (n=102), but this association was modified by severe brain injury, with children showing both epigenetic age acceleration and severe brain injury exhibiting higher motor scores.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Epigenetic age acceleration was associated with higher cognitive scores (β = 0.07; P = .04) and motor scores (β = 0.16; P = .003) in preterm infants.
- Higher maternal educational level was linked to better cognitive outcomes (β = 11.65; P = .005).
- Extreme prematurity (β = –5.66; P = .03) and severe brain injury (β = –10.99; P = .04) were associated with lower motor scores.
- Severe brain injury modified the association between epigenetic aging and motor outcomes (β = 0.41; P = .02), with epigenetic age acceleration linked to higher motor scores in the presence of severe brain injury.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Importance Studies examining biological factors associated with neurodevelopment in the preterm population are limited. It was previously demonstrated that epigenetic age acceleration was associated with better neurodevelopmental outcomes among children born preterm. It is unclear whether this association is modified by clinical and environmental preterm risk factors. Objective To examine whether the association between epigenetic aging and neurodevelopmental outcomes is modified by preterm brain injury and socioeconomic status. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a prospective cohort study of children born at 24 to 32 weeks’ gestation, recruited from 2 neonatal intensive care units from 2015 to 2019 and followed up to January 2026. The cohort was well characterized with clinical data, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and neurodevelopmental assessments (Bayley-III cognitive and motor domains) at 3 years. Participants with buccal epithelial cell DNA collected at 3 years were included. Exposure Epigenetic age (in weeks) at 3 years was determined using the pediatric buccal epigenetic clock and corrected for chronological age to give epigenetic age difference. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary analyses used linear regression to examine the association between epigenetic age difference, preterm risk factors (any brain injury, severe brain injury, maternal educational level), and cognitive and motor outcomes at 3 years. Secondary analyses examined whether brain injury and maternal education level modified the associations between epigenetic age difference and cognitive and motor outcomes at 3 years. Results A total of 102 study participants (median gestational age, 27.0 weeks [IQR, 25.6-28.9 weeks]; 54 female [53%]) were included. Higher maternal educational level (β = 11.65; 95% CI, 3.55-19.76; P = .005) and epigenetic age acceleration (β = 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.14; P = .04) were associated with higher cognitive scores. Epigenetic age acceleration was also associated with higher motor scores (β = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.06-0.27; P = .003), while extreme prematurity (β = –5.66; 95% CI, −10.85 to −0.46; P = .03) and severe brain injury (β = –10.99; 95% CI, −21.32 to −0.66; P = .04) were associated with lower motor scores. Severe brain injury modified the association between epigenetic aging and motor outcomes (β = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.08-0.74; P = .02), and children with epigenetic age acceleration in the presence of severe brain injury had higher motor scores. Conclusions and Relevance In this prospective preterm cohort study, epigenetic aging, severe brain injury, and socioeconomic status were associated with neurodevelopmental outcomes. Children with severe brain injury along with epigenetic age acceleration had higher motor scores. These findings suggest the association between epigenetic aging and neurodevelopment is context dependent and can vary based on the presence of preterm risk factors.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. JAMA Network Open, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthMedicine