PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Translational Psychiatry· 2026Q1

Prenatal stress and gestational epigenetic age: no evidence of associations based on a large prospective multi-cohort study

Chris Murgatroyd, Kristina Salontaji, Dinka Smajlagić, Christian M. Page et al.

Short summary

A large meta-analysis (n=3,928) found no evidence that prenatal maternal stress is associated with epigenetic gestational age at birth, using three different epigenetic clocks.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Meta-analysis of 3,928 mother-infant pairs from the Generation R, ALSPAC, and MoBa cohorts.
  • Prenatal stress, assessed cumulatively and by specific domains, showed no association with epigenetic gestational age acceleration or deceleration.
  • Three different epigenetic clocks (Bohlin, EPIC overlap, Knight) were used to estimate gestational age.
  • No significant associations were found when stratified by sex or when analyzing individual cohorts.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Psychological stress during pregnancy is known to have a range of long-lasting negative consequences on the development and health of offspring. Here, we tested whether a measure of prenatal early-life stress was associated with a biomarker of physiological development at birth, namely epigenetic gestational age, using foetal cord-blood DNA-methylation data. Longitudinal cohorts from the Netherlands (Generation R Study [Generation R], n = 1,396), the UK (British Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children [ALSPAC], n = 642), and Norway (Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study [MoBa], n1 = 1,212 and n2 = 678) provided data on prenatal maternal stress and genome-wide DNA methylation from cord blood and were meta-analysed (pooled n = 3,928). Measures of epigenetic age acceleration were calculated using three different gestational epigenetic clocks: "Bohlin", "EPIC overlap" and "Knight". Prenatal stress exposure, examined as an overall cumulative score, was not significantly associated with epigenetically-estimated gestational age acceleration or deceleration in any of the clocks, based on the results of the pooled meta-analysis or those of the individual cohorts. No significant associations were identified with specific domains of prenatal stress exposure, including negative life events, contextual (socio-economic) stressors, parental risks (e.g., maternal psychopathology) and interpersonal risks (e.g., family conflict). Further, no significant associations were identified when analyses were stratified by sex. Overall, we find little support that prenatal psychosocial stress is associated with variation in epigenetic age at birth within the general paediatric population.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Translational Psychiatry, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthMedicine