The Quarterly Journal of Economics· 2014Q1
Where is the land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States *
- 2,913citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
A 10 percentile increase in parental income correlates with a 3.4 percentile increase in child income nationally, but this rate varies significantly by US region, with San Jose showing higher upward mobility (12.9% chance of reaching top quintile from bottom) than Charlotte (4.4%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A 10 percentile rise in parent income correlates to a 3.4 percentile rise in child income nationally.
- Intergenerational mobility differs significantly across US regions.
- San Jose offers a 12.9% chance for a child from the bottom quintile to reach the top, versus 4.4% in Charlotte.
- High mobility areas correlate with less segregation, lower inequality, better schools, more social capital, and greater family stability.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract We use administrative records on the incomes of more than 40 million children and their parents to describe three features of intergenerational mobility in the United States. First, we characterize the joint distribution of parent and child income at the national level. The conditional expectation of child income given parent income is linear in percentile ranks. On average, a 10 percentile increase in parent income is associated with a 3.4 percentile increase in a child’s income. Second, intergenerational mobility varies substantially across areas within the United States. For example, the probability that a child reaches the top quintile of the national income distribution starting from a family in the bottom quintile is 4.4% in Charlotte but 12.9% in San Jose. Third, we explore the factors correlated with upward mobility. High mobility areas have (i) less residential segregation, (ii) less income inequality, (iii) better primary schools, (iv) greater social capital, and (v) greater family stability. Although our descriptive analysis does not identify the causal mechanisms that determine upward mobility, the publicly available statistics on intergenerational mobility developed here can facilitate research on such mechanisms.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Sociology and Political Science
Sociology and Political ScienceSocial Sciences