· 2012
Stone Age Economics
- 3,021citations
- 2012year
Short summary
Marshall Sahlins's "Stone Age Economics" argues that hunter-gatherer societies were the original "affluent society," challenging traditional economic views.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Hunter-gatherer societies are characterized as the original "affluent society."
- Economic systems are viewed as cultural categories, not solely rational behaviors.
- Subsistence economies may have provided a more fulfilled existence than modern industrial ones.
- The book revises traditional perspectives on so-called primitive societies.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Since its first publication over forty years ago Marshall Sahlins's Stone Age Economics has established itself as a classic of modern anthropology and arguably one of the founding works of anthropological economics. Ambitiously tackling the nature of economic life and how to study it comparatively, Sahlins radically revises traditional views of the hunter-gatherer and so-called primitive societies, revealing them to be the original "affluent society." Sahlins examines notions of production, distribution and exchange in early communities and examines the link between economics and cultural and social factors. A radical study of tribal economies, domestic production for livelihood, and of the submission of domestic production to the material and political demands of society at large, Stone Age Economics regards the economy as a category of culture rather than behaviour, in a class with politics and religion rather than rationality or prudence. Sahlins concludes, controversially, that the experiences of those living in subsistence economies may actually have been better, healthier and more fulfilled than the millions enjoying the affluence and luxury afforded by the economics of modern industrialisation and agriculture. This Routledge Classics edition includes a new foreword by David Graeber, London School of Economics.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Anthropology
AnthropologySocial Sciences