PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Medicine· 2026Q1· Review

CD38-targeted therapies in kidney disease: evidence maturity, disease-stage dependence, and biomarker-guided retreatment

Peidong Feng, Xiaoyong Yu

Short summary

Daratumumab-based therapy shows the most mature evidence for kidney outcomes in AL amyloidosis, while other CD38-targeted therapies have unproven long-term kidney or graft benefit despite early immunologic responses.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Daratumumab-based therapy has the most mature randomized evidence for kidney outcomes in AL amyloidosis.
  • Other CD38-targeted therapies show early immunologic/tissue/proteinuria responses in kidney and transplant indications, but long-term kidney/graft benefit is unproven.
  • Disease duration, prior treatment, and residual injury may explain variable responses.
  • Biomarkers can support monitoring but do not establish pathogenic-cell depletion or justify retreatment on their own.
  • Biomarker-guided dosing was feasible in a selected transplant cohort, requiring comparative validation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

CD38 targeting can reach antibody-secreting cells that persist after B-cell depletion, along with selected natural killer-cell and other immune-cell subsets. This narrative review examines CD38-targeted antibodies in immune-mediated and monoclonal immunoglobulin-related kidney diseases and kidney transplantation. It asks what clinical studies establish, how disease stage may affect response durability, and whether biomarkers can guide retreatment. Evidence differs by agent, regimen, and outcome. The most mature randomized evidence with kidney-organ outcomes comes from daratumumab-based combination therapy in immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis, a plasma-cell disorder. In other kidney and transplant indications, early-phase randomized trials and uncontrolled studies show immunologic, tissue, or proteinuria responses, but long-term kidney or graft benefit remains unproven. Disease duration, previous treatment, and residual tissue injury may help explain variable responses, although treatment selection by disease stage has not been validated. Biomarkers measure distinct aspects of response and can support monitoring; changes alone do not establish pathogenic-cell depletion or justify retreatment. Biomarker-guided dosing was feasible in a selected transplant cohort and requires comparative validation. Clinical interpretation must remain specific to the studied antibody and regimen. Research priorities include trials with kidney and graft outcomes, prospective patient selection, comparisons of treatment strategies, validation of biomarker-guided retreatment, and cumulative safety during repeated therapy.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Medicine, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Transplantation

TransplantationMedicine