PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Frontiers in Animal Science· 2026Q1

Integrating infrared thermography, behavioral assessment, and meat quality analysis to evaluate the effects of environmental enrichment in broiler chickens

Roberto Carlos Hernández-Sánchez, Francisco Ernesto Martínez-Castañeda, Juan Omar Hernández-Ramírez, Monica Paola Salcedo-Gómez et al.

Short summary

Environmental enrichment (EE) did not affect broiler final body weight but influenced leg health and meat quality, with Perch 2L showing potential inflammatory leg responses and Platform/Perch 2L improving water-holding capacity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Environmental enrichment (EE) did not affect final broiler body weight.
  • Infrared thermography indicated potential leg lesions in broilers with Perch 2L enrichment.
  • Meat quality, specifically pH and water-holding capacity (WHC), differed between control and enriched groups, with Perch 2L and Platform showing improved WHC.
  • Broiler preference for EE declined with age, influenced by design characteristics.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Introduction Environmental enrichment (EE) is used in broiler production to improve welfare, but findings on design preferences, behavior, production, and meat quality are heterogeneous. An integrative approach combining live and postmortem assessments may clarify the EE effects. This study evaluated the effects of different EE models on leg health, behavior, and meat quality in broilers. Methods Three hundred one-day-old Cobb 500 broilers were reared under commercial conditions until 49 days of age (DOA). At 21 DOA, birds were randomly allocated into three blocks (n=100), each containing four groups (n=25): Control, Perch 1 level (Perch 1L), Perch 2 level (Perch 2L), and Platform. Body weight was recorded weekly. The birds’ behavior was assessed at 28 and 42 DOA. Infrared thermography of the left and right intertarsal articulations and plantar surfaces was performed at 21 and 49 DOA. After slaughter, the chickens’ thigh meat was evaluated for texture, pH, color (L*, a*, b*), electrical conductivity (EC), and water-holding capacity (WHC) on days post-slaughter (DPS)) 0, 1, 2, 7, 10, and 15, depending on the parameter. Results EE did not affect final body weight. Thermography showed age-related decreases in superficial temperatures of intertarsal articulations and plantar surfaces; however, Perch 2L showed temperature changes suggestive of lesions. The Platform was the least-used EE, while other behavioral patterns were unaffected. Meat quality differed among groups in pH (DPS 0 and 10), L* (DPS 7), a* (DPS 2), and WHC (DPS 15), particularly between Control and Perch 2L. Differences across storage time were observed for pH (Control, Perch 2L, and Platform), L* (Perch 1L), a* (Platform), EC (Perch 1L), and WHC (all treatments). Discussion EE use declined with age, and preference appeared influenced by design characteristics such as material, height, and dimensions. Perch 2L may have been associated with an inflammatory response, whereas the Platform may have functioned primarily as an obstacle. Perch 2L and Platform improved WHC, potentially indicating differences in muscle development. Overall, EE did not affect live weight, but influenced selected behaviors, leg health, and meat quality, highlighting the need for an integrative assessment when evaluating EE in broiler production.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Small AnimalsVeterinary