PofoliaShared via Pofolia

· 2013

The Culture of Connectivity

José van Dijck

Short summary

This book analyzes the rise of social media platforms from their amateur origins to becoming global data mining corporations by 2012.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Social media platforms transformed from amateur communities to data-mining corporations by 2012.
  • Key platforms like Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, and Wikipedia share underlying ideological principles.
  • Practices like 'sharing,' 'liking,' and 'following' acquired specific technological and economic meanings.
  • The study offers a dual lens on techno-cultural and socio-economic aspects of social media.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This book studies the rise of social media in the first decade of the twenty-first century, up until 2012. It provides both a historical and a critical analysis of the emergence of networking services in the context of a changing ecosystem of connective media. Such history is needed to understand how the intricate constellation of platforms profoundly affects our experience of online sociality. In a short period of time, services like Facebook, YouTube and many others have come to deeply penetrate our daily habits of communication and creative production. While most sites started out as amateur-driven community platforms, half a decade later they have turned into large corporations that do not just facilitate user connectedness, but have become global information and data mining companies extracting and exploiting user connectivity. Offering a dual analytical prism to examine techno-cultural as well as socio-economic aspects of social media, the author dissects five major platforms: Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube, and Wikipedia. Each of these microsystems occupies a distinct position in the larger ecosystem of connective media, and yet, their underlying mechanisms for coding interfaces, steering users, filtering content, governance and business models rely on shared ideological principles. Reconstructing the premises on which these platforms are built, this study highlights how norms for online interaction and communication gradually changed. “Sharing,” “friending,” “liking,” “following,” “trending,” and “favoriting” have come to denote online practices imbued with specific technological and economic meanings. This process of normalization is part of a larger political and ideological battle over information control in an online world where everything is bound to become “social.”

The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Communication

CommunicationSocial Sciences