Open Forum Infectious Diseases· 2026Q1
Prevalence, determinants and outcomes of intravenous to oral switch of antibiotic therapy in hospitalized adults with bloodstream infection: secondary analysis of a multicenter cohort
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Only 32.3% of eligible hospitalized adults with bloodstream infection underwent a switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics by day 7, despite IVOS being associated with a shorter length of stay (7 vs. 12 days) and lower 28-day mortality.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Only 32.3% of eligible patients with bloodstream infection switched from intravenous to oral antibiotics by day 7.
- Diabetes, chronic kidney disease, high Pitt bacteremia score, and septic shock were identified as barriers to IVOS.
- A urogenital focus and two specific study centers were positively associated with IVOS.
- IVOS was associated with a shorter length of stay (7 vs. 12 days) and lower 28-day mortality.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background Intravenous to oral switch (IVOS) is considered safe in selected patients with bloodstream infection and provides operational advantages. Still, it is underused in many clinical settings. We evaluated IVOS patterns, associated factors and clinical outcomes in patients with bloodstream infection. Methods Secondary data from two prospective, multicenter cohort studies recruiting patients with bloodstream infection were analyzed. IVOS was assessed on day 3 and 7 after positive blood culture. Eligibility for IVOS was based on infectious focus, clinical safe switch criteria and antimicrobial susceptibility. Risk factors for non-IVOS were studied using multivariable logistic regression. Results Among 3824 patients, 2770 were included in secondary analysis, and 742 (19.4%) were eligible and evaluable for IVOS. By day 7, 240 patients (32.3%) underwent IVOS. Switch occurred on the day of discharge in 107 patients (44.6%), and one day before in 46 (19.2%). Most commonly used oral agents were ciprofloxacin (75 patients, 31.3%), sultamicillin (56, 23.3%), and cefuroxime axetil (27, 11.3%). Upon multivariable analysis, diabetes (OR=0.57 (0.38-0.88), p=0.010), chronic kidney disease (0.64 (0.41-0.99), p=0.048), Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 2 on day 3 (0.43 (0.19-0.97), p=0.042) and septic shock before day 7 (0.31 (0.11-0.87), p=0.027) were barriers to IVOS, while urogenital focus (2.22 (1.50-3.28), p<0.001) and two study centers were positively associated with IVOS. IVOS was associated with shorter length of stay (7 vs. 12 days, p<0.001) and lower 28-day mortality. Conclusions In clinically stable patients with bloodstream infection, IVOS was infrequently implemented. Barriers to IVOS should be addressed as part of antimicrobial stewardship programs.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Pharmacology (Medicine)
PharmacologyMedicine