PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Theory Culture & Society· 2018Q1

A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities

Rosi Braidotti

Short summary

This paper proposes a new theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities, grounded in a neo-Spinozist monistic ontology that emphasizes radical immanence and the primacy of intelligent matter.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Proposes a critical posthumanities framework based on neo-Spinozist monism and radical immanence.
  • Defines the posthuman knowing subject as relational, embodied, and accountable.
  • Introduces the concepts of mind-body and nature-culture continua.
  • Discusses implications for contemporary university research practices.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

What are the parameters that define a posthuman knowing subject, her scientific credibility and ethical accountability? Taking the posthumanities as an emergent field of enquiry based on the convergence of posthumanism and post-anthropocentrism, I argue that posthuman knowledge claims go beyond the critiques of the universalist image of ‘Man’ and of human exceptionalism. The conceptual foundation I envisage for the critical posthumanities is a neo-Spinozist monistic ontology that assumes radical immanence, i.e. the primacy of intelligent and self-organizing matter. This implies that the posthuman knowing subject has to be understood as a relational embodied and embedded, affective and accountable entity and not only as a transcendental consciousness. Two related notions emerge from this claim: firstly, the mind-body continuum – i.e. the embrainment of the body and embodiment of the mind – and secondly, the nature-culture continuum – i.e. ‘naturecultural’ and ‘humanimal’ transversal bonding. The article explores these key conceptual and methodological perspectives and discusses the implications of the critical posthumanities for practices in the contemporary ‘research’ university.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Theory Culture & Society, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cultural Studies

Cultural StudiesSocial Sciences