differences· 2012Q3
On Touching—the Inhuman That Therefore I Am
- 738citations
- Q3SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
Touching is paradoxical: on the human scale, it relies on electric repulsion preventing close contact between atoms, while on the subatomic scale, electrons gain energy by 'touching' themselves, with their existence dependent on a void holding virtual counterparts.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Human-scale touch relies on electric repulsion, preventing direct contact between atoms.
- Electrons gain energy by 'touching' themselves, an exchange with virtual counterparts.
- The existence of electrons depends on a void holding their virtual counterparts.
- These paradoxes challenge fixed notions of spatial and temporal identity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This essay explores the act of touching as it takes place in physical matter, in theorizing, and in the productive spaces where the two are indistinguishable. First, the author considers how feminist theory goes about touching science and unpacks touch as an act that reveals the self within the other and the other within the self. The essay then offers a tutorial in quantum field theory to prepare the reader for an unexpected interlocutor on the topic of touching: the electron. As Barad demonstrates with descriptions of electrons and how they have troubled physicists to the point of being “normalized” and called “immoral,” these particles resist normative notions of physical contact; they are perverse. On the human scale, electrons trouble the notion of touch by making it impossible to close the distance between atoms: the sense of touch paradoxically relies on electric repulsion between neighboring objects. On the subatomic scale, each electron gleans its energy from touching itself as if undergoing an exchange with another. Not only does the presence of contact come from its absence but also the presence of electrons themselves relies on a void holding their virtual counterparts. On every level, one can never reach the other—even the other within oneself. This paradox on the micro scale that constitutes all macro-scale matter calls into question the spatial and temporal fixity of identity. Barad shows that the notion of a unified, autonomous self is problematic not just on the personal level but on the particle level as well, and she responds to this deconstruction of matter with an ethics of response-ability.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. differences, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Cultural Studies
Cultural StudiesSocial Sciences