PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Clinical Infectious Diseases· 2026Q1

Surveillance Data Use Through the Fleming Fund: Informing Action on Antimicrobial Resistance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Archie Drake, Alesia Dedaa Ofori, Amy Rahmadanti, Ankur Gupta‐Wright et al.

Short summary

Fleming Fund experience shows antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance data are most effectively used at the facility level to inform stewardship and infection control, while national-level use drives policy changes like guideline revisions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • AMR surveillance data use is most prominent at the facility level in human health systems.
  • Facility-level data inform antimicrobial stewardship, infection prevention, and quality improvement.
  • National-level data use by the Fleming Fund led to revised treatment guidelines and essential medicines lists.
  • Data use pathways driven by local priorities are crucial for surveillance to inform action.
  • Integrating data use into system design increases the likelihood of surveillance informing action.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Drawing on the Fleming Fund's work to strengthen antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance across Africa and Asia during 2018–2026, this article provides one of the first syntheses of AMR surveillance data use in low- and middle-income countries. Methods A participatory synthesis for narrative review was conducted to summarize experience across administrative levels (facility, subnational, national, and regional). Results Data use was most evident at the facility level, in human health systems where resistance patterns, antimicrobial use, and clinical data increasingly informed antimicrobial stewardship, infection prevention and control, and other quality improvement initiatives. Data use in other sectors required different approaches. At the national level, Fleming Fund investments were associated with revisions of treatment guidelines, updates of essential medicines lists, and regulatory measures, primarily through improved governance and policy communities. Regional platforms supported member country data use at the national level. Subnational data use was undertaken in countries with decentralized health systems. Across levels, data use pathways driven by local priorities helped surveillance inform action. Conclusions Fleming Fund experience suggests that surveillance is more likely to inform action when data use is built into system design. Continued investment will be needed if AMR surveillance is to improve policy and practice in low- and middle-income countries.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Applied Microbiology and BiotechnologyImmunology and Microbiology