PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Choice Reviews Online· 2016

Why only us: language and evolution

Short summary

A new biolinguistic perspective, informed by Chomsky's Minimalist Program, defines language as a biological object and proposes an evolutionary account for its emergence and species-specific acquisition by humans.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Language acquisition in infants is a rapid, species-specific ability.
  • The Minimalist Program provides a framework to define language's core components for evolutionary study.
  • The biolinguistic perspective views language as a biological object with implications for evolutionary theory.
  • Evidence from songbird vocal learning offers insights into language evolution.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

We are born crying, but those cries signal first stirring of language. Within a year or so, infants master sound system of their language; a few years after that, they are engaging in conversations. This remarkable, species-specific ability to acquire any human -- the faculty -- raises important biological questions about language, including how it has evolved. This book by two distinguished scholars -- a computer scientist and a linguist -- addresses enduring question of evolution of language. Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky explain that until recently evolutionary question could not be properly posed, because we did not have a clear idea of how to define language and therefore what it was that had evolved. But since Minimalist Program, developed by Chomsky and others, we know key ingredients of and can put together an account of evolution of human and what distinguishes us from all other animals. Berwick and Chomsky discuss biolinguistic perspective on language, which views as a particular object of biological world; computational efficiency of as a system of thought and understanding; tension between Darwin's idea of gradual change and our contemporary understanding about evolutionary change and language; and evidence from nonhuman animals, in particular vocal learning in songbirds.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Choice Reviews Online, 2016 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Cultural Studies

Cultural StudiesSocial Sciences