PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of English-Medium Instruction· 2026Q1

Collaborative EMI

Jim McKinley, Heath Rose

Short summary

This paper argues that English-medium instruction (EMI) challenges stem from institutional design, not solely student language ability, proposing embedded collaboration between language and disciplinary experts across policy, program, and pedagogy.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • EMI challenges are misdiagnosed as student language ability issues, when they are more accurately problems of institutional design.
  • Language development and disciplinary teaching are often organized separately in universities, leaving students to bridge the gap.
  • Collaboration between language specialists and disciplinary lecturers should be embedded across policy, program design, and pedagogy, not just in individual classrooms.
  • Improving EMI requires shifting from proficiency-driven models to approaches that coordinate linguistic and disciplinary expertise within programs.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The rapid expansion of English-medium instruction (EMI) in higher education has generated a substantial body of research on student outcomes, language development, and classroom practice. Much of this work has focused on students’ English proficiency as a key determinant of success. Yet across EMI contexts, a consistent pattern emerges: students who meet institutional language requirements still encounter significant challenges in engaging with disciplinary knowledge through English. In this paper, we argue that EMI has been widely misdiagnosed as a problem of student language ability when it is more accurately understood as a problem of institutional design. In many universities, language development and disciplinary teaching are organised separately, leaving students to navigate the relationship between them on their own. Previous research has highlighted the value of collaboration between language specialists and disciplinary lecturers in EMI settings. We build on this work by examining how such collaboration can be embedded beyond individual classrooms and initiatives, and sustained across policy, programme design, and pedagogy. Drawing on recent EMI research and illustrative institutional examples, we outline how collaboration can be organised across these levels and identify practical mechanisms through which it can be enacted within programmes. We argue that improving EMI requires a shift away from proficiency-driven models toward approaches that coordinate linguistic and disciplinary expertise within programmes. In this sense, collaborative EMI offers a way of rethinking how universities organise teaching through English.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Literature and Literary Theory

Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities