Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice· 2026Q2
Fully Coupled Effective Stress Analysis of Pipeline Response Considering Dynamic Permeability during Liquefaction
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Neglecting dynamic permeability changes during liquefaction can underestimate pipeline uplift by up to 30%, increasing upheaval buckling risk.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A new model incorporates dynamic permeability variations during liquefaction, unlike conventional undrained analyses.
- Neglecting dynamic permeability can underestimate pipeline uplift by up to 30%.
- Internal operating pressure is identified as a critical parameter for pipeline stability during liquefaction.
- Current design protocols may require adjusted safety factors to ensure pipeline resilience.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Liquefaction-induced ground failure poses severe risks to the structural integrity of buried lifelines. While pipeline behavior in liquefiable soils has been widely studied, current design guidelines often overlook the complex hydromechanical coupling, specifically local flow and permeability variations, during earthquake loading. This study addresses this gap by implementing a specific state-dependent permeability algorithm (via FISH) within a two-dimensional fully coupled effective stress framework using the PM4Sand constitutive model. Unlike conventional undrained analyses, this approach captures the transient variation in hydraulic conductivity during excess pore-water pressure generation. Results demonstrate that neglecting these dynamic permeability effects can lead to an underestimation of pipeline uplift by up to 30%, significantly increasing the risk of upheaval buckling. Furthermore, the analysis investigates critical design parameters, including the pipeline material, internal operating pressure, relative density, and ground motion characteristics (near-field versus far-field). The findings indicate that internal pressure plays a significant role in stability and that current design protocols may require adjusted safety factors to ensure asset resilience against liquefaction-induced buoyancy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Civil and Structural Engineering
Civil and Structural EngineeringEngineering