PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Environment and Planning D Society and Space· 2026Q1

Reading Arctic imperialism through colonial urbanities: Three claims on Kalaallit Nunaat, 1951–2026

Tone Huse

Short summary

Arctic imperialism is enacted through distinct urban forms and imaginaries that impose specific temporal orders—frontier, developmental, and disruptive time—onto Kalaallit Nunaat, effectively domesticating the environment, Indigenous life, and sovereignty.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Arctic imperialism is analyzed through the lens of 'colonial urbanities'—urban forms, languages, or imaginaries imposed by external powers.
  • Three case studies illustrate this: the US military's Camp Century ('frontier time'), Danish welfare urbanism ('developmental time'), and a Silicon Valley 'freedom city' proposal ('disruptive time').
  • These urbanities enact a politics of time that displaces existing Kalaallit lifeways and constitutes 'domestication' of land, life, and sovereignty.
  • The urban imaginary is identified as a key instrument of territorial claim-making, operating through temporal ordering.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This article reads Arctic imperialism through urbanism, taking chronopolitics – the politics of time – as its analytical entry point. It examines three projections of urbanity onto Kalaallit Nunaat: the US military's ‘city under the ice’ (Camp Century, 1959–1967), Danish welfare colonial urbanism (1950s–1970s), and the Silicon Valley ‘freedom city’ proposal (2025–present). Each is read as a colonial urbanity – a distinct urban form, language, or imaginary through which an external power claims territory and orders time on colonised land. Each enacts a distinct politics of time – frontier time , developmental time , disruptive time – through material and imaginary registers, evicting existing Kalaallit lifeways to an anachronistic past. The article further argues that this temporal ordering constitutes domestication : of the hostile environment, of Indigenous life, and of sovereignty itself. Each urbanity encounters, however, an active past – an existing order of inhabitation that refuses to be displaced. Together, the three cases reveal that the urban imaginary is itself an instrument of territorial claim-making, doing chronopolitical work in advance of, or instead of, built form.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Environment and Planning D Society and Space, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Geography, Planning and Development

Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSocial Sciences