The International Journal of Evidence & Proof· 2026Q2
‘In the shadow of the gunman?’: Revisiting the legitimacy of the witness security programme in Ireland
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Ireland's police-led Witness Security Programme (WSP) faces significant legitimacy challenges in its pre- and post-trial stages, according to an analysis of documentary and interview data.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Ireland's Witness Security Programme (WSP) is police-led and operates south of the border.
- The WSP's legitimacy is examined in the context of Northern Ireland's 'supergrass system'.
- The study analyzes the WSP through documentary and semi-structured interview data.
- Legitimacy issues are identified in the pre-trial and post-trial stages of the WSP.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The police practice of the use of criminal informants and the provision to them of witness protection raises serious questions about trust and legitimacy in the policing of organised crime and beyond. Indeed, the deeply flawed ‘supergrass system’ created in Northern Ireland during ‘The Troubles’ perhaps represents the apotheosis of this ‘morally hazardous’ undertaking. Against this background, this article examines the legitimacy of the witness security programme (WSP) south of the border, a police-led programme that – given the history of these measures in Northern Ireland and their overspill into the Republic – provides a ‘hard test’ for these tactics. Drawing on documentary and semi-structured interview data, the article examines the legitimacy of the WSP in a systematic, chronological manner, following the three key stages in the process: pre-trial, trial, and post-trial. It concludes that, in respect of at least two of the stages of the witness protection process in Ireland – namely, the pre- and post-trial stages – significant aspects of State-run witness protection are difficult to reconcile with the core indices of legitimacy.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Law
LawSocial Sciences