PofoliaShared via Pofolia

AILA Review· 2026Q1

Toward digital equity

Amir Michalovich, Ron Darvin

Short summary

This conceptual article redefines digital multimodal composing (DMC) as a power-laden social practice, not a neutral tool-use process, proposing a critical model that centers identity, capital, and ideology to explain participation and potential for agency.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Redefines digital multimodal composing (DMC) as a social practice shaped by power relations, not just tool use.
  • Proposes a critical model of DMC centering identity, capital, and ideology to analyze participation.
  • Identifies five interrelated processes of DMC: gathering, imagining, integrating, reflecting, and sharing.
  • Demonstrates how power dynamics explain constraints and potential for agency in DMC, especially in language learning.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Digital multimodal composing (DMC) is often framed in terms of the use of digital tools to make meaning through multiple modes such as language, image, sound, and gesture. Yet such a focus can make DMC appear to be a neutral process of assembling semiotic resources, rather than a social practice shaped by unequal relations of power. Composing has long been understood as a process of identity construction, and research on DMC has shown that embedded within its practices are inequalities and ideologies that must be examined if DMC is to give rise to possibilities for agency and transformative practice. To cast a light on these issues, this conceptual article offers a redefinition of DMC and draws on Darvin and Norton’s (2015) model of investment to propose a critical model of DMC . Centering the interconnected dimensions of identity, capital and ideology , this proposed model highlights how learners are positioned and position themselves in DMC processes, how access to material, linguistic, semiotic, cultural, and social resources is unevenly distributed and differentially valued, and how norms, policies, and patterns of control shape the conditions of participation. It asserts DMC as dynamic, recursive, and nonlinear practices that unfold across five interrelated processes: gathering, imagining, integrating, reflecting , and sharing . Mapping identity, capital, and ideology across these processes, the article shows how attention to power can help explain both the constraints that circumscribe DMC and its potential to challenge exclusionary conditions, particularly in language learning contexts. The paper concludes by outlining implications, for educators and researchers, of viewing DMC as a situated, ideological, and power-laden practice.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. AILA Review, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Literature and Literary Theory

Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities