AILA Review· 2026Q1
Dealing with topics of potential cross‑cultural sensitivity among transnational groups of pre-service language teachers in video‑mediated virtual exchange interactions
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Pre-service language teachers in a virtual exchange between Türkiye and Poland navigated sensitive topics (religion, history) in video-mediated interactions, finding these digital spaces can act as 'safe' yet 'brave' environments where discussions, though sometimes brief or using humor, rarely led to conflict.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Virtual exchange settings can facilitate 'brave' conversations on sensitive cross-cultural topics.
- Participants in a Türkiye-Poland virtual exchange managed sensitive topics (religion, history) in video-mediated interactions.
- Interactional resources like laughter, topic shifts, and elaborations were used to navigate sensitive discussions.
- Topic initiations on sensitive subjects did not typically lead to tension or conflict.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Conversations involving potentially sensitive topics across cultures pose challenges not only for L2 speakers engaged in intercultural communication but also for researchers seeking to understand the mechanisms of such interactions. Digital spaces have long offered rich affordances to address these challenges — primarily by facilitating easier cross-cultural access and creating pedagogically and interculturally meaningful interactive environments. This article explores one such setting: video-mediated interactions among pre-service language teachers within the scope of a virtual exchange project between Türkiye and Poland. Using multimodal conversation analysis, the study examines how participants manage cross-culturally sensitive topics (e.g., religion and history/war) on a turn-by-turn basis during video-mediated interactions. I argue that virtual exchange contexts can serve as ‘safe’ spaces for ‘brave’ conversations and for engaging with sensitive issues, where topic initiations do not typically lead to tension or conflict — even when the legitimacy of the topic may be negotiable. The findings reveal that sensitive topics are managed through a variety of interactional resources, including laughter, topic continuers or shifters, extended elaborations, or brief and counter-argumentative responses, depending on the topic initiated. The findings offer new insights into the challenges and affordances of digital spaces for applied linguistics, intercultural communication, and language teacher education research.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. AILA Review, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Language and Linguistics
Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities