The International Journal of Design in Society· 2026Q2
Materiality and Meaning
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Textile design can resist the loss of symbolic, sensory, and ritualistic depth in fashion by reclaiming materiality and conscious experience, transforming artifacts from surfaces of accelerated consumption into symbolic systems that produce cultural and affective meaning.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Textile artifacts are increasingly reduced to objects of accelerated consumption and superficial visuality, losing symbolic, sensory, and ritualistic depth.
- Byung-Chul Han's philosophy highlights how positivity and acceleration empty aesthetic experience of negativity, which requires time, contemplation, and permanence.
- Textile design can act as a field of resistance by re-emphasizing materiality, conscious experience, and the symbolic value of textiles.
- Phenomenology offers insights into sensory perception and attachment, supporting the understanding of textiles as relational and culturally meaningful systems.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This article proposes a reflection on new ways of thinking about textile and fashion design, drawing on the philosophical thought of Byung-Chul Han, particularly his works Saving Beauty and The Disappearance of Rituals. In dialogue with materiality studies and phenomenology, this article discusses the progressive loss of symbolic, sensory, and ritualistic depth in textile artefacts, which are often reduced to objects of accelerated consumption, superficial visuality, and rapid obsolescence. According to Han, the logic of positivity, acceleration, and performance empties aesthetic experience of its constitutive negativity, understood as that which requires time, contemplation, attachment, and permanence. Within this context, textiles cease to operate as symbolic mediators and come to exist predominantly as visual and functional surfaces. This article argues that textile design can function as a field of resistance to this sensory impoverishment by reclaiming materiality, conscious experience, and the symbolic value of textiles. From this perspective, these artifacts are understood as symbolic systems capable of producing cultural and affective meaning. Phenomenology, furthermore, contributes to an understanding of sensory perception in the construction of experience with materials, thus providing a conceptual tool for thinking about attachment and relational bonds. By articulating these perspectives, the article proposes textile design as a critical and interconnected practice, capable of reintroducing ritual, temporality, and meaning into the contemporary experience of fashion.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The International Journal of Design in Society, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Museology
MuseologyArts and Humanities