Scientometrics· 2026Q1
Mutualism in socio-semantic networks: structural correlates of publication output across ecosystem approaches to health
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Lower bipartite modularity in socio-semantic networks is strongly associated with higher publication output across ecosystem approaches to health (Spearman ρ = −0.79, p < 0.001).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Lower bipartite modularity in socio-semantic networks is negatively and robustly associated with publication output (Spearman ρ = −0.79, p < 0.001).
- Higher nestedness showed a positive but non-significant association with publication output (ρ = +0.39, p = 0.11).
- The study analyzed 6,406 publications across three ecosystem approaches to health (EcoHealth, One Health, Planetary Health) from 2004–2023.
- The findings suggest that author communities touching multiple topics (low modularity) enhance mutual visibility and publication output.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract While existing scientometric research has examined how individual network position and team composition affect citation-based performance, less is known about how the structural configuration of socio-semantic networks relates to collective publication output. We propose that publication output is associated with configurations that foster mutual visibility between research topics (memes) and author communities. Drawing on mutualistic network theory from ecology, we hypothesise that lower bipartite modularity (H1) and higher nestedness (H2) are associated with higher publication output. We analyse 6,406 publications across three ecosystem approaches to health (EcoHealth, One Health, Planetary Health) over 18 approach × period observations (2004–2023), linking author communities to 20 research topics identified by Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Our analyses show an empirical asymmetry: bipartite modularity is negatively and robustly associated with publication output (Spearman ρ = −0.79, p < 0.001; robust across four community detection algorithms and under leave-one-out by approach), whereas weighted nestedness shows a positive but non-significant association ( ρ = +0.39, p = 0.11), in a direction consistent with H2 but without statistical support at the cell level. The modularity result supports the H1 component of the framework: low modularity — author communities touching multiple topics — fosters mutual visibility between authors and themes. Given the observational design, we report these as field-level patterns, not causal mechanisms. The non-significant association for H2, combined with marked algorithmic variability, invites reconsidering how nestedness is operationalised in socio-semantic contexts. By integrating social and semantic dimensions within a mutualistic framework, this approach complements existing scientometric tools.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientometrics, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyDecision Sciences