PLoS ONE· 2026Q1
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the ISBAR structured handover observation tool for ICU-to-ward patient transfer in China
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new Chinese version of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool, adapted and validated, shows high reliability and validity for assessing ICU-to-ward patient transfers.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool was cross-culturally adapted and psychometrically validated for Chinese clinical settings.
- The adapted tool achieved a scale-level content validity index (CVI/Ave) of 0.98 and high inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.939).
- Experienced nurses scored significantly higher on the tool than less experienced nurses, demonstrating known-groups validity.
- A total of 233 ICU-to-general ward handovers involving 84 nurses were observed and evaluated.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The Identity, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (ISBAR) framework is used to standardize clinical handovers. Effective ISBAR implementation requires both training and objective assessment of handover. In Chinese clinical settings, handover quality is commonly evaluated through self-reports or locally developed checklists, which provide limited information about the completeness and accuracy of information transfer. The absence of validated Chinese observational instruments restricts the identification of communication deficiencies, benchmarking of handover performance, and development of targeted workforce training and patient safety interventions. This study aimed to conduct a cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the ISBAR Structured Handover Observation Tool and evaluate its applicability in Chinese clinical practice. The study was conducted in two phases: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation in clinical settings. Content validity was assessed using the content validity index (CVI). Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in a two-way mixed-effects model with absolute agreement. Known-groups validity was examined using the Mann-Whitney U test to compare scores across nurses with varying levels of experience. A total of 233 ICU-to-general ward handovers involving 84 nurses were observed and evaluated. The scale demonstrated good content validity, with item-level CVIs ranging from 0.86 to 1.00 and a scale-level CVI/Ave of 0.98. Based on 50 randomly selected handovers, inter-rater reliability was high, with an ICC of 0.885 for single-rater assessments and 0.939 for average-rater assessments. Known-groups validity analysis showed that nurses with more experience had significantly higher total scores than those with less experience (Z = -4.772, p < 0.001). The Chinese version tool demonstrates satisfactory validity and reliability for evaluating structured handover performance. The tool may be used to identify communication gaps, support competency-based training, monitor handover performance, and provide evidence for patient safety initiatives, facilitating its integration into nursing management and patient safety programs in Chinese clinical settings.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Emergency Medicine
Emergency MedicineMedicine