PofoliaShared via Pofolia

European Heart Journal Open· 2026Q1

Sex differences in the diabetes-related risk of incident myocardial infarction and relationship to established CHD risk factors. The Tromsø Study (1979-2016)

Grethe Albrektsen, Tom Wilsgaard, Ivar Heuch, Dag Steinar Thelle et al.

Short summary

Diabetes increases myocardial infarction (MI) risk more in women (IRR 2.26) than men (IRR 1.84) from age 45/55, but established risk factors (lipids, blood pressure, smoking) substantially reduce this gap, particularly in women (-33.6% vs. -15.9% in men).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Diabetes increases MI risk by 2.26x in women and 1.84x in men, with risk apparent from age 55 in women and 45 in men.
  • The triglyceride to HDL-cholesterol ratio, systolic blood pressure, and smoking collectively explain a larger portion of the diabetes-MI association in women (-33.6%) than in men (-15.9%).
  • Systolic blood pressure's impact on the diabetes-MI association was larger in women (-10.3%) compared to men (+2.2%).
  • Smoking strengthened the diabetes-MI association more in men (+23.1%) than in women (+7.1%).
  • Adverse lipid levels and elevated systolic blood pressure were evident even before the pre-diabetic phase.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Aim To examine whether the adverse effect of diabetes on the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) differs between sexes and assess to what extent established coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factors contribute to the elevated risk. Methods Prospective study of 42,907 Tromsø Study participants (51.5% women) with 3942 incident MI (357 with diabetes) at ages 35–104 years. Relative risks (IRR) were estimated in Poisson regression analyses. Impact of CHD risk factors was quantified as percentage change in the regression coefficient for diabetes. Results A contrast in risk of MI by diabetes status was seen from age 45 in men and 55 in women. Adjusted for age and birth-cohort, the IRR was 2.26 in women and 1.84 in men (p = 0.12, test for interaction). In a mutually adjusted model, adjustment for the triglyceride to HDL-cholesterol ratio weakened the association with diabetes similarly in women (-19.0%) and men (−17.0%), systolic blood pressure had larger impact in women (-10.3% vs. + 2.2%), whereas smoking strengthened the association more in men (+23.1% vs. + 7.1%). Body mass index had minor impact. A larger joint impact of adjustment factors in women (-33.6% vs. -15.9%) narrowed the initial gender gap (adjusted IRR of 1.72 and 1.67 respectively). Adverse lipid levels and increasing systolic blood pressure emerged already during the pre-diabetic phase. Conclusions Traditional CHD risk factors contributed substantially to the diabetes-related risk of incident MI. A larger joint impact of these factors in women reduced the initial observed sex difference in the adverse effect of diabetes.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Heart Journal Open, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Endocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismMedicine