Sustainability· 2026Q1
A Governance-Centered Framework for Longitudinal Municipal Sustainable Development Evaluation
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new framework, GCSDA, operationalized as MSDGAF, evaluates municipal sustainable development by focusing on governance processes, not just outcomes, revealing Laredo, Texas, has strong capacity and implementation but weaker performance and outcomes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Developed the Governance-Centered Sustainable Development Assessment (GCSDA) framework with four domains: Governance Capacity, Implementation, Performance, and Sustainable Development Outcomes.
- Operationalized GCSDA as the Municipal Sustainable Development Governance Assessment Framework (MSDGAF) using longitudinal documentary analysis and governance maturity assessment.
- Applied MSDGAF to Laredo, Texas (2000-2025) using 468 City Council meetings and 13,259 observations.
- Findings show Laredo has sustained institutional capacity and implementation, but less consistent organizational performance and community-level outcomes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Sustainability assessment has become a crucial component of public policy, urban planning, and sustainable development research. Most assessment methodologies remain predominantly outcome-oriented, evaluating community conditions while paying comparatively less attention to the governance processes through which sustainable development is pursued. This study develops Governance-Centered Sustainable Development Assessment (GCSDA), a theoretical framework that distinguishes four domains: Governance Capacity, Governance Implementation, Governance Performance, and Sustainable Development Outcomes. The Municipal Sustainable Development Governance Assessment Framework (MSDGAF) operationalizes GCSDA through longitudinal documentary analysis, evidence-based classification, process tracing, and governance maturity assessment. The framework is applied to the City of Laredo, Texas, using 468 regular City Council meetings from 2000 to 2025 and 13,259 governance observations. The findings reveal sustained institutional capacity and implementation alongside substantially less consistent evidence of organizational performance and community-level outcomes. Sensitivity analysis and longitudinal governance maturity analysis showed that the central longitudinal pattern remained stable despite marginal sampling variation. The study contributes to sustainability governance by distinguishing governmental capability and action from organizational performance and community conditions while maintaining a cautious relationship between municipal governance and outcomes influenced by broader contextual factors. It introduces a transparent and potentially transferable methodology, subject to cross-municipal validation, for longitudinal municipal research. GCSDA and MSDGAF complement outcome-centered sustainability assessment by providing a structured approach for examining how municipalities govern sustainable development over time.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Sustainability, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Geography, Planning and Development
Geography, Planning and DevelopmentSocial Sciences