Brain Sciences· 2026Q2
Opening the Black Box of Ayres Sensory Integration®: Clarifying Mechanisms of Change from Treatment Theory to Participation
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Ayres Sensory Integration® (ASI) is best understood as a treatment theory targeting proximal sensory-motor capacities, with participation outcomes explained by an enablement framework, integrating data-driven decision making to clarify ambiguities.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- ASI theory is best understood as a treatment theory targeting proximal sensory-motor capacities.
- Participation-level outcomes are more comprehensively explained through an enablement framework.
- Integrating these perspectives with data-driven decision making clarifies ambiguities in ASI literature.
- This approach strengthens intervention specification, evaluation, and interpretation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Ayres Sensory Integration® (ASI) remains one of the most widely used and debated intervention approaches in occupational therapy and related disciplines. Recent advances in rehabilitation treatment specification and reporting frameworks, including the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and the Reporting Guideline for Intervention Description in Rehabilitation (GUIDE-Rehab), emphasize the need for precise articulation of treatment ingredients, mechanisms of action, and targets. However, interventions grounded in neurodevelopmental theories, such as Ayres’ theory of sensory integration, are complex, and may present challenges when interpreted within linear causal models. This paper argues that ASI theory is best understood as a treatment theory targeting proximal sensory–motor capacities, while participation-level outcomes may be more comprehensively explained through an enablement framework. Integrating this perspective with data-driven decision making (DDDM) clarifies longstanding ambiguities in the ASI literature and strengthens intervention specification, evaluation, and interpretation.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Brain Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Occupational Therapy
Occupational TherapyHealth Professions