Trauma Violence & Abuse· 2016Q1· Review
Campus Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Research From 2000 to 2015
- 736citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
A systematic review of 34 studies (2000-2015) found unwanted sexual contact and sexual coercion to be the most prevalent forms of campus sexual assault (CSA), followed by incapacitated rape, and then forcible rape.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Unwanted sexual contact and sexual coercion are the most prevalent forms of campus sexual assault (CSA).
- Incapacitated rape and forcible rape are less prevalent than unwanted sexual contact and coercion.
- Extensive variability in prevalence findings exists across studies.
- Differences in sampling, study design, and measurement tools explain much of the variability in findings.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Sexual assault is a pervasive problem on university and college campuses in the United States that has garnered growing national attention, particularly in the past year. This is the first study to systematically review and synthesize prevalence findings from studies on campus sexual assault (CSA) published since 2000 ( n = 34). The range of prevalence findings for specific forms of sexual victimization on college campuses (i.e., forcible rape, unwanted sexual contact, incapacitated rape, sexual coercion, and studies' broad definitions of CSA/rape) is provided, and methodological strengths and limitations in the empirical body of research on CSA are discussed. Prevalence findings, research design, methodology, sampling techniques, and measures, including the forms of sexual victimization measured, are presented and evaluated across studies. Findings suggest that unwanted sexual contact appears to be most prevalent on college campuses, including sexual coercion, followed by incapacitated rape, and completed or attempted forcible rape. Additionally, several studies measured broad constructs of sexual assault that typically include combined forms of college-based sexual victimization (i.e., forcible completed or attempted rape, unwanted sexual contact, and/or sexual coercion). Extensive variability exists within findings for each type of sexual victimization measured, including those that broadly measure sexual assault, which is largely explained by differences in sampling strategies and overall study designs as well as measures of sexual assault used in studies. Implications for findings and recommendations for future research on the prevalence of college-based sexual victimization are provided.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Gender Studies
Gender StudiesSocial Sciences