PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Actuators· 2026Q2

Parametric Investigation of Sweeping Jet Actuation for Near-Wall Flow Recovery in a Curved Channel

Jiawei Lu, Jinsheng Song, Zihao Qiu, Xin Wen et al.

Short summary

Sweeping jet actuation weakened near-wall low-speed regions and promoted local streamwise velocity recovery in a curved channel, with a 60° incidence angle and placement at the bend's start showing the most balanced response.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Sweeping jet actuation was used to mitigate near-wall velocity deficits in a curved channel.
  • A 60° jet incidence angle and placement at the start of the bend yielded a balanced local recovery response.
  • Flow recovery is a combined effect of actuator spacing, number, and input, not solely spacing.
  • The study provides experimental data for selecting sweeping jet parameters in curved channel flow control.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This study presents a planar particle image velocimetry (PIV) investigation of near-wall velocity deficit mitigation in a compact curved channel using sweeping jet actuation. A compact sweeping jet oscillator was developed based on a simplified fluidic oscillator configuration and integrated into the curved wall region of the channel. The effects of jet incidence angle, actuator placement, array layout, and jet-to-freestream velocity ratio were examined within a fixed streamwise measurement window near the curved wall. The analysis focuses on time-averaged in-plane velocity fields and representative streamwise velocity profiles, with emphasis on changes in the near-wall low-speed region and local streamwise velocity recovery. The results show that sweeping jet actuation can weaken the measured near-wall low-speed region and promote local streamwise velocity recovery within the planar PIV window. Among the tested cases, a jet incidence angle of 60° and actuator placement at the beginning of the bend produced a more balanced local recovery response. The comparison between different array layouts indicates that the observed recovery is affected by the combined influence of actuator spacing, actuator number, and total actuation input; therefore, it should not be interpreted as an isolated spacing effect. The present results provide a systematic low-speed experimental basis for selecting sweeping jet incidence angle, actuator placement, array configuration, and equivalent actuation input in compact curved channel flow control applications. The findings clarify how different actuation parameters affect local near-wall velocity deficit mitigation and streamwise velocity recovery within a controlled optical access configuration.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Actuators, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Aerospace Engineering

Aerospace EngineeringEngineering