PofoliaShared via Pofolia

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders· 2026Q2· Review

Diagnostic accuracy and discriminative validity of clinician-administered physiotherapy examination tests in adults with nonspecific neck pain: a systematic review

Dariusz Ciborowski, Tomasz Halski, Beata Borecka, Jakub Taradaj et al.

Short summary

Clinician-administered physiotherapy tests may characterize impairment patterns in adults with nonspecific neck pain, particularly in sensorimotor, muscle performance, and movement control domains, but direct clinical diagnostic accuracy evidence is lacking.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • No study evaluated direct clinical diagnostic accuracy for nonspecific neck pain in samples reflecting diagnostic uncertainty.
  • Most evidence comes from known-groups comparisons between adults with nonspecific neck pain and asymptomatic controls.
  • A manual examination cluster showed favorable classification estimates, but this was for symptomatic vs. asymptomatic groups, not direct diagnosis.
  • Tests may characterize impairment patterns in sensorimotor, muscle performance, and movement control domains.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

To synthesize evidence on the diagnostic/classification accuracy and discriminative validity of clinician-administered physiotherapy examination tests used in adults with nonspecific neck pain, distinguishing individual-level classification of prespecified clinical or impairment states from known-groups discrimination between nonspecific-neck-pain and asymptomatic samples. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Eligible studies evaluated routine physiotherapy examination tests in adults with nonspecific neck pain. The review independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2 domains for studies contributing threshold-based classification or construct-aligned validity estimates against explicit comparators, and a design-matched case-control appraisal for known-groups discriminative-validity studies. Narrative synthesis was performed. Eighteen studies were included. No study evaluated direct clinical diagnostic accuracy in a sample reflecting diagnostic uncertainty. Most evidence came from known-groups comparisons between adults with nonspecific neck pain and asymptomatic controls. Two studies reported threshold-based classification or construct-aligned validity estimates, but these were derived from separate symptomatic and asymptomatic group design or construct-aligned designs rather than clinically uncertain symptomatic samples. A manual examination cluster showed the most favorable threshold-based classification estimate, but this finding reflected symptomatic-versus-asymptomatic group classification rather than direct diagnosis of nonspecific neck pain. Current evidence suggests that clinician-administered physiotherapy examination tests may help characterize impairment patterns in adults with nonspecific neck pain, particularly within sensorimotor, muscle-performance, and selected movement-control domains. However, direct clinical diagnostic-accuracy evidence is lacking, and most available evidence comes from studies comparing people with neck pain against asymptomatic controls. These designs help identify impairment differences between groups but provide limited information about whether a test can classify patients in routine clinical practice. The review did not evaluate differential diagnosis of nonspecific neck pain from specific cervical disorders. Rather, it examined classification and impairment-discrimination evidence within the nonspecific-neck-pain literature. These tests should therefore be interpreted as adjuncts within a multimodal clinical assessment rather than as standalone diagnostic tools. Registration: OSF osf.io/7twf2.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Pharmacology (Medicine)

PharmacologyMedicine