Clinical Rehabilitation· 2026Q1
A novel digital intervention to support mental and sexual wellbeing after stroke and brain injury: A feasibility randomised controlled trial
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
An 8-week online intervention (HOPE4ABI) for stroke/brain injury survivors showed promising 6-month improvements in mental and sexual wellbeing, despite not fully meeting engagement or acceptability targets in a feasibility trial (n=53).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The HOPE4ABI digital intervention for stroke/brain injury survivors met recruitment (72.6%) and 6-month retention (84.9%) feasibility targets.
- Engagement (52.3%) and acceptability (75.7%) criteria were not fully met, prompting further qualitative exploration.
- Participants demonstrated improvements in mental wellbeing, sexual wellbeing, and quality of life at 6 months post-intervention.
- A definitive RCT is recommended to assess the intervention's efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Objective To assess the feasibility of a novel digital self-management intervention (HOPE4ABI) supporting mental and sexual wellbeing for stroke and acquired brain injury survivors. Design Parallel, 1:1 allocation, two-arm feasibility randomised controlled trial. Setting Online. Participants U.K.-based adults (n = 53) living with any type of acquired brain injury, sustained at least 3 months prior to trial entry. Intervention Participants were randomly assigned to the self-guided (n = 26) or group-facilitated (n = 27) 8-week online intervention. All participants received identical information and intervention content, but peer-to-peer interactions and facilitation were only available in the group-facilitated arm. Outcome measures Primary outcomes were rates of recruitment, retention, engagement and acceptability, measured against a priori criteria. Secondary outcomes were scores on measures of mental wellbeing, sexual wellbeing and quality of life, recorded at baseline, 8 weeks and 6 months. Results The recruitment rate was acceptable (n = 53/73; 72.6%). At 6 months, questionnaire data were available for n = 45/53 (84.9%), thus meeting the progression criteria. Neither the engagement criteria (52.3%, n = 23/44), nor acceptability criteria (75.7%, n = 28/37) were met, and were explored further in post-intervention interviews. Six-month follow-up data showed improvements in mental wellbeing, sexual wellbeing and quality of life relative to baseline. Conclusions On balance, a definitive RCT is warranted to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. The primary feasibility outcomes of recruitment and retention rate met the progression criteria, and engagement and acceptability issues were addressed through participant feedback. There were signals of efficacy noted across all outcome measures at 6-month follow-up. ISRCTN Reg No ISRCTN46988394.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Clinical Rehabilitation, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Applied Psychology
Applied PsychologyPsychology