Critical Social Policy· 2026Q1
The benevolent cage: Moral governance, gendered disablement, and the shadow welfare state in contemporary Thailand
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Thai families, acting as a shadow welfare state due to policy absence, govern blind street musicians through moral frameworks (karma, pity, hierarchy) that create a 'benevolent cage' of confinement, with women facing compounded obligations and men's kinship standing being precarious.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Families in Thailand function as a 'shadow welfare state' due to policy gaps.
- Moral frameworks (karma, pity, hierarchy) create a 'benevolent cage' of confinement for blind street musicians.
- Gendered dynamics impose compounded obligations on women and precarious kinship standing on men.
- Economic contribution becomes a transactional mechanism for belonging, driven by welfare absence.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
This study investigates how disability is relationally produced and negotiated within Thai family dynamics. While scholarship often treats the family as a benign support unit, this article conceptualises it as a site of governance that can produce psycho-emotional disablism. Integrating critical family theory with the social relational model of disability, the analysis draws on interviews with 32 blind street musicians (19 men, 13 women). A moralised framework of karmic consequence, compassionate pity, and elder-junior hierarchy authorises a benevolent cage of confinement. Gender stratifies these dynamics, imposing compounded obligation on women while rendering men's standing precarious through erasure from kinship structures. Welfare absence compels families to function as a shadow welfare state, wherein a debt of gratitude becomes a transactional mechanism making belonging conditional upon economic contribution. Non-transactional arrangements indicate that economic conditionality is a structural adaptation rather than a cultural inevitability. The findings conceptualise familial disablement as policy-mediated and call for rights-based defamilialisation.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Critical Social Policy, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Safety Research
Safety ResearchSocial Sciences