The Pacific Review· 2026Q1
Asian new regionalism revisited: ASEAN–China interactions in the 21 st century
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Asian new regionalism is reconceptualized as a pluralistic, multi-actor, multi-layered, and rule-shaping configuration, as demonstrated by dynamic ASEAN-China interactions across digital, financial, and strategic domains.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Asian new regionalism is redefined as a pluralistic, multi-actor, multi-layered, and rule-shaping regional configuration.
- ASEAN-China interactions serve as a key case study, demonstrating regionalism across digital, financial, and strategic domains.
- The process is influenced by regional agency, great-power pressures, and the new geopolitics.
- Key dynamics include the interplay of state and non-state actors and the rise of regulatory governance in emerging sectors.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ASEAN–China interactions constitute a critical site for reassessing the contemporary dynamics of new regionalism in the 21st century. While scholarship has moved beyond state-led and Eurocentric paradigms, gaps remain in understanding how new regionalism evolves in Asia. This article revisits Asian new regionalism and reconceptualises it as a pluralistic, multi-actor, multi-layered, and rule-shaping form of regional configuration engulfed by internal and external challenges. As demonstrated by ASEAN–China interactions, this process unfolds across digital, financial, and strategic domains and develops through regional agency under great-power pressures and the new geopolitics. This article addresses three core questions: What defines the contemporary characteristics of Asian new regionalism? How do these interactions shed new light on its changing forms and modalities? What shapes its trajectories toward integration, fragmentation, or reconfiguration? Drawing on empirical analyses of ASEAN–China interactions, the article highlights the interplay of the state and non-state actors, the rise of regulatory governance in emerging sectors, and the region’s adaptive responses to internal and external changes. As a rework of Asian new regionalism, this essay offers an empirically grounded and theoretically informed account of the Global South’s changing role in regional and global governance.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Pacific Review, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences