Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
Micro-computed tomography analysis of root and canal morphology in maxillary primary molars
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Micro-CT scans of 60 maxillary primary molars show a second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in 43.3% of cases, often overlooked, and highlight thin apical dentin, particularly in palatal roots (0.10 mm).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- 43.3% of maxillary primary molars have a second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal.
- The MB1–MB2 inter-orifice distance is the shortest of any canal pair (mean 1.12 mm).
- Apical dentin thickness is thinnest in palatal roots (0.10 mm).
- Three-rooted molars were predominant (83.3%).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Effective pulpectomy of maxillary primary molars depends on a clear understanding of their complex internal root canal anatomy, yet high-resolution data on the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal in the primary dentition remain scarce. Using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT; SkyScan 1172; 13.61 μm isotropic voxel size), the three-dimensional root and canal morphology of 60 extracted maxillary primary molars were charaterized, focusing on the prevalence, location, and morphometry of the MB2 canal, along with inter-orifice distances, canal diameters, and dentin wall thickness. Three-rooted molars predominated (83.3%). An MB2 canal was present in 43.3% of mesiobuccal roots and, when present, was consistently located palatal to the main mesiobuccal (MB1) canal, originating predominantly in the coronal third. Long-oval and oval cross-sections together accounted for almost all canals. The MB1–MB2 inter-orifice distance was the shortest of any canal pair (mean 1.12 mm), and buccolingual diameters exceeded mesiodistal diameters in the mesiobuccal, MB2, and distobuccal roots but not the palatal root. Apical dentin was thinnest in the palatal roots (0.10 mm). Maxillary primary molars therefore combine a frequently overlooked MB2 canal with thin apical walls. These findings may help clinicians plan access cavities, select instruments, and perform conservative apical preparation during pulpectomy procedures.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oral Surgery
Oral SurgeryDentistry