PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Clinical features, epidemiology, and survival of patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia in the SEER database

Shan Liu, Yaobin Lin, Jianzhen Shen

Short summary

Core binding factor AML (CBF-AML) incidence rose 2.84-2.89% annually (2000-2023), with CBFB::MYH11 subtypes showing better overall and cancer-specific survival than RUNX1::RUNX1T1, except in patients aged ≥ 60.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • CBF-AML incidence increased annually by 2.84% for CBFB::MYH11 and 2.89% for RUNX1::RUNX1T1 subtypes (2000-2023).
  • CBFB::MYH11 AML patients had longer overall and cancer-specific survival than RUNX1::RUNX1T1 patients.
  • Survival differences by subtype were not significant in patients aged ≥ 60.
  • Age, chemotherapy, and second malignant neoplasm (SMN) were independent predictors of overall survival.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) (RUNX1::RUNX1T1 or CBFB::MYH11) is a favorable-risk but heterogenous subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, understanding of its epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and prognosis is limited. A total of 70,912 records of adults with AML, including 947 with CBFB::MYH11 and 1,285 with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 CBF-AML were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000–2023) and analyzed. Incidence trends were assessed using the annual percent change (APC); prognostic factors were identified using multivariable Cox regression; and survival was compared between groups using the Kaplan–Meier method. The CBFB::MYH11 and RUNX1::RUNX1T1 subtypes accounted for 1.3% and 1.8% of cases of AML, respectively, and incidence was higher in men and adults aged < 60 years. The incidence of CBF-AML increased significantly during the study period (APC 2.84% for CBFB::MYH11 and 2.89% for RUNX1::RUNX1T1 subtypes). Sex, age, and chemotherapy were independent predictors of overall survival (OS) in both subtypes. Second malignant neoplasm (SMN) was associated with poorer cancer-specific survival (CSS), and radiotherapy was associated with poorer OS in patients with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 AML. Patients with CBFB::MYH11 AML had longer OS and CSS than those with RUNX1::RUNX1T1 AML, but CSS did not differ significantly by subtype in patients aged ≥ 60 years. Untreated patients had a median OS of 1 month. The prognosis of CBF-AML is generally favorable but differs by subtype. Age, chemotherapy, and SMN are key predictors of survival. Timely diagnosis and initiation of chemotherapy is critical, especially in older patients.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hematology

HematologyMedicine