Computers in Human Behavior Reports· 2026Q1
PreCare: Designing AI assistants for Advance Care Planning (ACP) to enhance personal value exploration, patient knowledge, and decisional confidence
- 1citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
The PreCare AI assistant, featuring three interactive modules for value elicitation, knowledge delivery, and consequence review, demonstrated preliminary evidence of improving personal value exploration, perceived knowledge, and decisional confidence in an exploratory study (n=12), and was preferred by 92% of participants.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- PreCare is an AI assistant designed to enhance Advance Care Planning (ACP) through interactive modules.
- The AI features three assistants: one for value elicitation, one for in-context knowledge, and one for consequence review.
- A usability study yielded an excellent SUS score for PreCare.
- An exploratory comparative study (n=12) indicated preliminary improvements in value exploration, perceived knowledge, and decisional confidence.
- 92% of participants in the exploratory study preferred the interactive AI assistance over static methods.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a process that enables individuals to clarify their values, define goals and preferences for future medical care, discuss them with family and health-care providers, and record and review them. Despite high reach, today’s ACP websites and apps are static : presenting information and collecting responses without using user input to (i) deepen exploration of personal values, (ii) ensure sufficient ACP knowledge, or (iii) help users reflect on potential consequences of their decisions for themselves (e.g., quality of life) and others (e.g., caregiver burden) before recording their preferences. This research was conducted in Taiwan. We first conducted two formative studies: (1) shadowing five ACP group consultations delivered by three multidisciplinary clinical teams (each comprising a physician, a nurse, and a social worker) at a tertiary medical center, followed by semi-structured interviews with six ACP professionals (three physicians, two social workers, one nurse); and (2) interviewing 14 users of a static ACP website. Leveraging these insights, we developed PreCare in collaboration with ACP professionals, with a three-assistant conversational workflow: a semi-structured value-elicitation assistant; an in-context knowledge assistant based on a clinician-validated corpus; and a non-directive consequence-review assistant. A usability study (n = 12; 5 male, 7 female; age range = 22–64 years, mean = 46, SD = 17) showed that PreCare achieved a usability rating (SUS) of excellent. In an exploratory comparative study (n = 12; 5 male, 7 female; age range = 26–73 years, mean = 52, SD = 17), interactive assistance showed preliminary evidence of improved exploration of personal values, perceived knowledge, and decisional confidence, and was preferred by 92% of participants. We contribute design-oriented recommendations for interactive, non-directive support for reflection, knowledge, and consequence review for ACP and other decisional support systems.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthMedicine