PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Nursing Management· 1993Q1

Effects of work organization on the mental health of nursing staff

Vicenta Escribà‐Agüir, Santiago Pérez‐Hoyos, Francisco Bolúmar

Short summary

A survey of 973 nurses found that work organization factors significantly impact mental health, with schedule dissatisfaction and high psychological/mental load increasing fatigue and psychological symptoms (PORs 1.80-2.36).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Work schedule dissatisfaction increased fatigue risk (POR 2.15) and psychological symptoms (POR 2.36).
  • High psychological and mental load at work raised fatigue risk (PORs 2.00, 1.86) and psychological symptoms (PORs 1.80, 2.10).
  • Permanent night shifts increased sleep disturbance risk (POR 2.00), while rotating night shifts also showed an increased risk (POR 1.34).
  • Mental health indicators studied included fatigue, sleep disturbance, and psychological/psychosomatic symptoms.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

A survey was carried out among a sample of 973 nurses in hospitals in the Valencian Community (Spain). The aim was to study the relation between work organization, sociodemographic and professional factors and the mental health of nursing staff. The information was collected by means of a questionnaire. Three indicators were used to study mental health: fatigue, sleep disturbance and psychological or psychosomatic indicators of mental suffering. Work organization affected the mental health of workers with varying impact according to the mental health indicator under consideration. Dissatisfaction due to work schedule, psychological and mental load increased the risk of showing signs of fatigue, with a prevalence odds ratio (POR) of 2.15, 2.00, 1.86, respectively, along with the risk of psychological symptoms with a POR of 2.36, 1.80, 2.10, respectively. Permanent night shifts or rotating night shifts increased the risk of sleep disturbance with a POR of 2.00 and 1.34 respectively.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Nursing Management, 1993 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Occupational Therapy

Occupational TherapyHealth Professions