PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Research Synthesis Methods· 2026Q1

Between-case incidence rate ratio for single case experimental designs with count outcomes: A Monte Carlo simulation with conditional and marginal models

Haoran Li, Chendong Li, Wen Luo, Eunkyeng Baek

Short summary

A new proportional estimator, the between-case incidence rate ratio (BC-IRR), is introduced for single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) with count outcomes, evaluated via Monte Carlo simulation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Introduces the between-case incidence rate ratio (BC-IRR) as a new proportional estimator for SCEDs with count outcomes.
  • Evaluates BC-IRR using GLMMs and GEEs through a large-scale Monte Carlo simulation.
  • Assesses statistical properties including bias, standard error bias, mean squared error, and coverage rate.
  • Demonstrates BC-IRR estimation with real data and provides recommendations for applied researchers.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Calculating design-comparable effect sizes in single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) is essential for research synthesis to identify evidence-based practices that integrate findings from both SCEDs and group-based designs. The field has made significant progress in developing additive design-comparable effect sizes in recent years. This study aims to evaluate the statistical properties of a newly developed proportional estimator, the between-case incidence rate ratio (BC-IRR), for SCEDs with count outcomes. Two analytical frameworks are introduced for estimating BC-IRR: generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) and generalized estimating equations (GEEs). A large-scale Monte Carlo simulation is conducted to assess the bias of the point estimate, the standard error bias, mean squared error, and coverage rate. We also demonstrate the estimation of BC-IRR using GLMMs and GEEs with real data. Based on the simulation and demonstration results, we provide recommendations for applied researchers, discuss limitations, and outline directions for future research.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Research Synthesis Methods, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Statistics and Probability

Statistics and ProbabilityMathematics