Policy Studies Journal· 2017Q1
The Environmental Performance of Participatory and Collaborative Governance: A Framework of Causal Mechanisms
- 403citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
A new framework identifies five causal mechanisms explaining how participatory and collaborative governance can improve or worsen environmental outcomes, distinguishing between standard-setting and implementation phases.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Five clusters of causal mechanisms link participation to environmental outcomes.
- Mechanisms are categorized by their impact on output standards versus implementation.
- Key mechanisms include representation of environmental concerns, knowledge, dialogue, acceptance, conflict resolution, and networks.
- The framework identifies conditions that determine whether participation improves or degrades environmental outcomes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Many have advocated for collaborative governance and the participation of citizens and stakeholders on the basis that it can improve the environmental outcomes of public decision making, as compared to traditional, top-down decision making. Others, however, point to the potential negative effects of participation and collaboration on environmental outcomes. This article draws on several literatures to identify five clusters of causal mechanisms describing the relationship between participation and environmental outcomes. We distinguish (i) mechanisms that describe how participation impacts on the environmental standard of outputs, from (ii) mechanisms relating to the implementation of outputs. Three mechanism clusters focus on the role of representation of environmental concerns, participants' environmental knowledge, and dialogical interaction in decision making. Two further clusters elaborate on the role of acceptance, conflict resolution, and collaborative networks for the implementation of decisions. In addition to the mechanisms, linking independent with dependent variables, we identify the conditions under which participation may lead to better (or worse) environmental outcomes. This helps to resolve apparent contradictions in the literature. We conclude by outlining avenues for research that builds on this framework for analysis.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Policy Studies Journal, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Public Administration
Public AdministrationSocial Sciences