PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Urban Geography· 2012Q1

(Re)theorizing Cities from the Global South: Looking Beyond Neoliberalism

Susan Parnell, Jennifer Robinson

Short summary

Urban scholarship must "provincialize" neoliberalism to make space for theories more relevant to the majority of the world's urban population, now concentrated in the Global South.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Global urbanization has shifted to the Global South, necessitating a recalibration of urban theory.
  • Neoliberalism's hegemonic status in progressive geographical literature needs to be "provincialized".
  • The 'right to the city' literature and debates on subnational state size/shape offer alternative frameworks.
  • Greater attention to documenting urban change in under-researched Global South cities is crucial.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The demographic transition of the late 20th and early 21st centuries has shifted the locus of urbanizing populations from the global North to the global South. As the theoretical epicenter of urban scholars and policymakers adjusts to accommodate this transition, some realignment in how ideas are weighted and applied is inevitable. This recalibration, while not necessarily comfortable for those in established positions of intellectual power, is desirable and maybe even overdue. The overarching argument presented here is that recent work on neoliberalism, despite its quality and relevance for many places, will need to be "provincialized" in order to create intellectual space for alternative ideas that may be more relevant to cities where the majority of the world's urban population now resides. To this end, we explore the limits to the critique of neoliberalism—a perspective that has assumed hegemonic dimensions in the progressive geographical literature. In seeking post-neoliberal insights, we highlight two bodies of work that also address issues of urban injustice. The first is the largely practice-generated literature on poverty and its amalgamation into a resurgent literature focused on the right to the city. The second theoretical framework we explore as a counterpoint to the neoliberal crtitique is the nascent debate about the size and shape of the subnational state, arguing that it is time to bring to the fore the difficult question concerning the most appropriate form of urban government. Finally, we suggest that if the state is to be an important component in the urban developmental landscape, all sorts of initiatives in research and capacity-building will be needed, giving substantially greater attention to documenting urban change on hitherto under-researched cities, and learning from practice how to transform the theoretical canon to ensure 21st-century relevance. Keywords: right to the cityurban povertypost-neoliberalismstate/civil society interfacedevelopmental stateglobal Southgood citySouth African city

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Urban Geography, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Urban Studies

Urban StudiesSocial Sciences