PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Consumer Research· 2012Q1

Frustrated Fatshionistas: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Consumer Quests for Greater Choice in Mainstream Markets

Daiane Scaraboto, Eileen Fischer

Short summary

Plus-sized consumers, or 'Fatshionistas,' mobilize to demand greater fashion choice from mainstream markets by developing collective identity, identifying institutional entrepreneurs, and leveraging adjacent field logics.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Fatshionistas mobilize for greater fashion choice from mainstream markets.
  • Mobilization is triggered by collective identity, institutional entrepreneurs, and adjacent field logics.
  • Consumers use change strategies that challenge specific practices while reinforcing broader institutional logics.
  • Market change dynamics depend on consumer legitimacy and the alignment of demands with existing institutions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Why and how do marginalized consumers mobilize to seek greater inclusion in and more choice from mainstream markets? We develop answers to these questions drawing on institutional theory and a qualitative investigation of Fatshionistas, plus-sized consumers who want more options from mainstream fashion marketers. Three triggers for mobilization are posited: development of a collective identity, identification of inspiring institutional entrepreneurs, and access to mobilizing institutional logics from adjacent fields. Several change strategies that reinforce institutional logics while unsettling specific institutionalized practices are identified. Our discussion highlights diverse market change dynamics that are likely when consumers are more versus less legitimate in the eyes of mainstream marketers and in instances where the changes consumers seek are more versus less consistent with prevailing institutions and logics.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Consumer Research, 2012 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Urban Studies

Urban StudiesSocial Sciences