Quality and Reliability Engineering International· 2026Q2
A DBN‐Based Risk and Reliability Information Mapping Method for Adaptive Decision Support in Safety‐Critical Operations
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) method maps risk and reliability information, transforming DBN outputs into semantic signals (risk severity, escalation probability, etc.) to adapt decision support for safety-critical operations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A five-layer framework connects DBN risk inference to adaptive decision support.
- DBN results are translated into semantic signals: risk severity, variation trend, escalation probability, inference certainty, dominant risk chain, and task stage.
- These signals regulate the presentation of recommended actions, evidence, guidance, and confidence cues.
- An adaptive DBN approach significantly improved response time, action accuracy, critical-item hit rate, and reduced decision omissions and incorrect operations compared to baseline methods (p < 0.05).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT To support decision‐making under dynamic risk, uncertainty, and high information load in safety‐critical operations, this study proposes a dynamic bayesian network (DBN)‐based risk and reliability information mapping method. The method establishes a five‐layer framework that connects dynamic risk inference, semantic state representation, mode determination, strategy regulation, and trustworthy decision‐support output. DBN posterior results are transformed into decision‐oriented semantic signals, including risk severity, variation trend, escalation probability, inference certainty, dominant risk chain, and task stage. These signals determine the current support mode and regulate the presentation of recommended actions, key evidence, procedural guidance, verification items, and confidence cues. Strategy regulation mechanisms further stabilize support under changing uncertainty and risk‐state transitions. A human‐in‐the‐loop experiment compared predefined Baseline, Baseline‐Fixed, and Adaptive conditions. Based on Holm‐adjusted p ‐values, Adaptive achieved significantly better performance than both comparison conditions across all six predefined indicators ( p < 0.05). The main improvements included faster response and critical‐information localization, higher action accuracy and critical‐item hit rate, and lower decision omission and fewer incorrect operations. The results demonstrate that DBN‐based dynamic risk information can be systematically transformed into adaptive and reliability‐oriented decision support for safety‐critical operations.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyDecision Sciences