PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances· 2026Q1

Gender and climate financing in non-self-governing territories: the case of Western Sahara

Katheryne Aldana Villalobos, María Jesús Muñoz Torres, Juana María Rivera‐Lirio

Short summary

Climate finance laws fail to adequately address gender and refugee status in conflict zones, creating a structural gap between stated principles and institutional practice, as shown by an analysis of Western Sahara.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Climate finance laws inadequately integrate gender and refugee status in conflict contexts.
  • A structural gap exists between normative principles (equity, human rights) and institutional architecture in climate finance.
  • Analysis of 30 global and African climate finance instruments revealed systematic exclusion of refugee populations and gender inequalities.
  • Western Sahara, a non-self-governing territory, serves as a case study for these legal and institutional shortcomings.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to address an explicit gap in the literature on climate finance in conflict contexts. This research examines global and regional climate financing laws, incorporating gender and refugee status considering the case of Western Sahara, a non-self-governing territory (NSGT) pending decolonisation. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a qualitative that applies critical content analysis to 30 global and regional (African) climate finance instruments. The analytical lens drew on regulatory ecology (laws) and critical public policy analysis, based on which systematic manual coding was conducted, recording both the presence and form of normative treatment, enabling cross-instrument comparison and the detection of structural regularities. Findings Climate finance laws insufficiently address the intersection of gender, refugee status and conflict, configuring a structural gap between normative discourse and institutional architecture. Although laws and policies proclaim principles of equity, differentiated responsibility and human rights, the institutional architecture systematically reproduces exclusions in conflict contexts, particularly among refugee populations and gender inequalities. Research limitations/implications This study focuses exclusively on law (hard and soft law) and does not analyse technical documents specific to climate finance mechanisms or the other dimensions of regulatory ecology. While recognising their importance and interdependence, this work proposes an advance in theoretical debates on climate finance in conflict-affected and colonially unresolved contexts, leaving the door open for continued exploration through empirical works examining the other dimensions of regulatory ecology. Originality/value The paper addresses an original and underexplored topic by examining climate finance, gender, refugee status and non-self-governing territory status through the case of Western Sahara.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The Bottom Line Managing Library Finances, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Finance

FinanceEconomics, Econometrics and Finance