PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Regional Environmental Change· 2026Q2

Making blue carbon governable in China: standardisation, local experimentation and policy implications

Wanhao Zhang

Short summary

Blue carbon in China is being operationalized through a 'two-wheel' structure: national policy and accounting standards combined with local implementation devices like platforms, funds, and insurance.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Blue carbon is being constructed as a governable climate space in China, with standardization serving as essential metrological infrastructure.
  • Policy implementation follows a 'two-wheel' structure, integrating national policy direction and unified accounting with local devices like platforms, carbon-inclusion schemes, funds, and insurance.
  • Market-based blue carbon implementation hinges on institutionalizing uncertainty into verifiable rules at manageable costs, rather than just willingness to trade.
  • Structural bottlenecks, including inter-departmental coordination, uneven local capacity, and unresolved risk allocation, hinder the credibility and scalability of blue carbon initiatives.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

China’s dual-carbon agenda has elevated blue carbon from a broad ecological aspiration to an actionable policy domain requiring accounting standards, measurement, reporting and verification (MRV), and institutional implementation pathways. This article examines how blue carbon policies are made operational in China, focusing on the institutional and technical devices through which marine carbon sinks are rendered calculable, verifiable and governable. Drawing on Jasanoff’s notion of sociotechnical imaginaries, it treats blue carbon not as a pre-given natural–technical object, but as a policy object iteratively defined, quantified, verified and recalibrated through policy narratives, standardisation, methodological rule-making and local experimentation. Methodologically, the study combines thematic analysis of national and coastal local policy documents, standards, accounting guidelines and regional methodologies with semi-structured interviews with 12 domain experts across policy, research and market-facing practice. Four findings emerge. First, blue carbon is constructed as a governable climate space, with standardisation functioning as metrological infrastructure. Second, implementation follows a two-wheel structure in which national policy direction and unified accounting grammars are made operable through local devices such as platforms, carbon-inclusion schemes, funds, insurance and judicial compensation. Third, market-facing implementation depends less on willingness to trade than on whether methodologies and MRV systems can institutionalise uncertainty into verifiable rules at bearable cost. Fourth, structural bottlenecks—cross-department coordination, uneven local capacity and unresolved risk allocation—shape credibility and scalability. The article contributes a mechanism-oriented account of how blue carbon moves from policy ambition to institutional operation under uncertainty.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Regional Environmental Change, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Management, Monitoring, Policy and LawEnvironmental Science