PofoliaShared via Pofolia

· 2017· Book chapter

The Public Realm

Lyn H. Lofland

Short summary

This book defines and analyzes the 'public realm' as a social-psychological space dominated by interactions between strangers, common in urban settings like bars, buses, and plazas.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Defines the 'public realm' as a social-psychological space where strangers interact, prevalent in urban environments.
  • Examines the social life, norms, and pleasures within these public spaces.
  • Identifies forces like anti-urbanism and privatization as threats to the public realm.
  • Argues for the public realm to be a direct object of scholarly study, not just an interpretation of existing work.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

This book is about the "public realm," defined as a particular kind of social territory that is found almost exclusively in large settlements. This particular form of social-psychological space comes into being whenever a piece of actual physical space is dominated by relationships between and among persons who are strangers to one another, as often occurs in urban bars, buses, plazas, parks, coffee houses, streets, and so forth. More specifically, the book is about the social life that occurs in such social-psychological spaces (the normative patterns and principles that shape it, the relationships that characterize it, the aesthetic and interactional pleasures that enliven it) and the forces (anti-urbanism, privatism, post-war planning and architecture) that threaten it. The data upon which the book's analysis is based are diverse: direct observation; interviews; contemporary photographs, historic etchings, prints and photographs, and historical maps; histories of specific urban public spaces or spatial types; and the relevant scholarly literature from sociology, environmental psychology, geography, history, anthropology, and architecture and urban planning and design. Its central argument is that while the existing body of accomplished work in the social sciences can be reinterpreted to make it relevant to an understanding of the public realm, this quintessential feature of city life deserves much more u it deserves to be the object of direct scholarly interest in its own right. Choice noted that: "The author's writing style is unusually accessible, and the often fascinating narrative is generously supported by well-chosen photos."

The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2017 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Urban Studies

Urban StudiesSocial Sciences