PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Visualized Experiments· 2026Q2

Recovery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Capsular Release in Patients With Preoperative Stiffness: A Cohort Study

Fan Zhang

Short summary

Adding capsular release to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients with preoperative shoulder stiffness accelerated functional recovery by an estimated 3.8 weeks and reduced the need for secondary stiffness interventions (1.6% vs. 16.1%) compared to repair alone, though final function at 12 months was similar.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Concomitant capsular release accelerated estimated time to functional range of motion by 3.8 weeks in stiff shoulders.
  • Capsular release reduced secondary stiffness interventions from 16.1% to 1.6%.
  • Final shoulder function at 12 months was similar between groups.
  • No statistically significant increase in retears was observed with capsular release.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Preoperative shoulder stiffness may delay functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, but the incremental value of concomitant capsular release remains uncertain. This retrospective comparative cohort study evaluated 124 patients with reparable rotator cuff tears and preoperative stiffness who underwent arthroscopic repair with concomitant capsular release (CR group, n = 62) or without capsular release (No CR group, n = 62). Shoulder function, pain, active forward elevation, and active external rotation were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Additional outcomes included estimated time to functional range of motion, persistent stiffness, secondary stiffness-related interventions, patient satisfaction, complications, and repair integrity on 12-month magnetic resonance imaging. Multivariable analyses were used to account for measured baseline differences associated with nonrandom treatment allocation. Compared with the CR group, the No CR group had a 3.71-point lower adjusted American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score at 6 months and had a 3.80-week longer estimated time to functional range of motion. Any secondary stiffness-related intervention was required in 1.6% of the CR group and 16.1% of the No CR group. Persistent stiffness and retear were numerically less frequent in the CR group, but the adjusted associations were not statistically significant. By 12 months, functional outcomes had largely converged. Concomitant capsular release was associated primarily with earlier recovery and a lower stiffness-related treatment burden rather than superior final functional status. No statistically significant increase in retear was observed at 12 months, but the small number of events limits conclusions regarding structural safety.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Surgery

SurgeryMedicine