Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences· 2026Q1
Artificial patination as a selective filter: experimental insights into interpretative bias in metalwork wear analysis
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Artificial patination selectively reduces the visibility of shallow use-wear traces on copper alloy artefacts, preserving only pronounced features and potentially leading to underestimation of artefact function.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Artificial patination significantly reduces the visibility of shallow use-wear traces on copper alloy artefacts.
- Only pronounced surface features are preserved under patination, while advanced corrosion can obscure most traces.
- Mechanical cleaning can re-expose original features but also introduce new surface modifications.
- The observable surface of metal artefacts is a transformed signal, not a direct record of use.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract The analysis of use-wear traces on metal artefacts is increasingly applied in archaeological research, yet its interpretative reliability remains limited by post-depositional surface transformation. In particular, the impact of corrosion and patina on trace visibility has rarely been investigated under controlled experimental conditions. This study presents a controlled experiment designed to examine how an artificially induced patina affects the visibility and interpretability of known surface traces on copper alloy artefacts. A replica bronze knife with experimentally generated surface modifications was subjected to a staged patination process, followed by microscopic observation at successive stages of surface transformation and after partial mechanical cleaning. The results demonstrate that patination acts as a selective filter, systematically reducing the visibility of shallow traces while preserving only the most pronounced surface features. Advanced corrosion stages may obscure the majority of traces, whereas cleaning procedures re-exposed original features and introduced new surface modifications. These observations indicate that the observable surface of metal artefacts does not represent a direct record of past use, but rather a transformed and selectively preserved signal shaped by corrosion and conservation processes. This introduces a systematic bias in metalwork wear analysis, favouring the detection of high-intensity traces and potentially leading to underestimation or misinterpretation of artefact function. The study highlights the need to explicitly account for surface transformation processes in the analysis of archaeological metal artefacts and provides an experimental framework for evaluating the reliability of trace-based interpretations.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Archeology (Social Sciences)
ArcheologySocial Sciences