PofoliaShared via Pofolia

The International Journal of Logistics Management· 2026Q1

Formal and informal institutions shaping gender diversity, equity, and inclusion in OSCM

BRUNA DA SILVA SANTIAGO, Rodrigo Goyannes Gusm�ão Caiado, Luiz Felipe Scavarda, Kenyth Alves de Freitas et al.

Short summary

Formal institutions promote G-DEI adoption in OSCM, but their impact is limited when not aligned with daily practices, as informal institutions often undermine this coupling, leading to superficial policy adoption without substantive change.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Formal institutions drive G-DEI adoption in OSCM via regulatory compliance.
  • Substantive G-DEI impact requires coupling formal structures with daily organizational practices.
  • Informal institutions, especially in traditional gender role environments, often decouple formal G-DEI commitments from operational realities.
  • Organizations may adopt superficial G-DEI policies and governance for external conformity, while core HR and supply chain practices remain unchanged.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines how formal and informal institutions affect gender diversity, equity, and inclusion (G-DEI) initiatives in human resources and performance within operations and supply chain management (OSCM) environments characterized by traditional gender roles. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a multi-method approach, combining qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with quantitative analysis using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Cross-Impact Matrix-Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC). Findings Findings reveal that although formal institutions promote the adoption of G-DEI initiatives through regulatory compliance, their substantive impact depends on how strongly these formal structures are coupled with everyday organizational practices. In institutional environments shaped by entrenched gender norms, informal institutions often undermine this alignment, decoupling formal commitments from operational realities. As a result, organizations may adopt visible G-DEI policies and governance mechanisms that signal conformity to external stakeholders, while core human resource routines and supply chain practices remain largely unchanged. Drawing on Institutional Theory, these findings explain how the interaction between formal and informal institutions shapes the implementation and performance outcomes of G-DEI initiatives in OSCM. Originality/value The originality lies in revealing the hidden influence of institutional forces and integrating qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a comprehensive framework for evaluating G-DEI initiatives in OSCM.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Gender Studies

Gender StudiesSocial Sciences