PLoS ONE· 2026Q1
Comparative evaluation of YOLO models for retained root fragment detection
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
YOLO12n achieved the highest performance in detecting retained root fragments in dental radiographs, with a mean best-epoch F1 score of 0.885 ± 0.007 and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.447 ± 0.025, outperforming other YOLO nano-scale models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- YOLO12n achieved the highest F1 score (0.885 ± 0.007) and mAP@0.5:0.95 (0.447 ± 0.025) for retained root fragment detection among four YOLO nano-scale models.
- YOLO11n was the second-best performing model, with an F1 score of 0.874 ± 0.012 and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.445 ± 0.019.
- A hybrid bilateral filtering and histogram equalization preprocessing pipeline improved YOLO12n's F1 score from 0.856 to 0.888 and mAP@0.5:0.95 from 0.438 to 0.461.
- All tested YOLO models showed stable convergence during training over 200 epochs.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to develop and comparatively evaluate four YOLO nano-scale one-stage object detectors—YOLOv8n, YOLOv10n, YOLO11n, and YOLO12n—for the automated detection of retained root fragments in dental radiographic images, under identical preprocessing, training, and evaluation protocols. Methods A curated dataset was organized in the YOLO format and evaluated using a nested 5-fold cross-validation strategy to prevent data leakage. An ablation study was additionally conducted to validate the combined bilateral filtering and histogram equalization (BF + HE) preprocessing pipeline. Four YOLO models were fine-tuned from official pretrained weights over 200 epochs. Detection performance was assessed at both the epoch level and the decision-threshold level, reporting the unbiased mean and standard deviation across the independent test folds for precision, sensitivity, F1 score, mean average precision (mAP), and false positives per image (FP/image). Results In the primary multi-model benchmark, YOLO12n achieved the highest overall detection performance across the held-out test folds, yielding a mean best-epoch F1 score of 0.885 ± 0.007, mAP@0.5 of 0.919 ± 0.021, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 0.447 ± 0.025 (reaching an optimal-threshold F1 score of 0.888 ± 0.016 with 0.346 ± 0.052 FP/image). YOLO11n followed closely as the second-best performing architecture (F1 = 0.874 ± 0.012, mAP@0.5:0.95 = 0.445 ± 0.019). Furthermore, the preprocessing ablation study confirmed that the hybrid BF + HE pipeline improved detection performance over raw radiographs, elevating YOLO12n's F1 score from 0.856 ± 0.013 to 0.888 ± 0.016 and mAP@0.5:0.95 from 0.438 ± 0.011 to 0.461 ± 0.008. All models demonstrated stable convergence behavior. Conclusions Modern YOLO architectures, particularly YOLO12n and YOLO11n, demonstrate technical efficacy for automated RRF localization. The observed performance advantages of YOLO12n are associated with its overall architectural refinements, though dedicated modular ablation studies are warranted to isolate the exact contribution of individual attention mechanisms. These findings demonstrate the technical feasibility of lightweight one-stage object detectors for identifying retained root fragments in dental panoramic radiographs, serving as a baseline for future prospective clinical evaluations.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS ONE, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oral Surgery
Oral SurgeryDentistry