Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science· 2018Q1
Diagnosis and prediction of periodontally compromised teeth using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm
- 499citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm achieved 81.0% diagnostic accuracy for premolars and 76.7% for molars in identifying periodontally compromised teeth (PCT) from periapical radiographs.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- A deep CNN algorithm was developed to diagnose and predict periodontally compromised teeth (PCT).
- Diagnostic accuracy for PCT was 81.0% for premolars and 76.7% for molars.
- Prediction accuracy for extraction necessity was 82.8% for premolars and 73.4% for molars.
- The study used a dataset of 1,740 periapical radiographic images for training, validation, and testing.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to develop a computer-assisted detection system based on a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm and to evaluate the potential usefulness and accuracy of this system for the diagnosis and prediction of periodontally compromised teeth (PCT). METHODS: Combining pretrained deep CNN architecture and a self-trained network, periapical radiographic images were used to determine the optimal CNN algorithm and weights. The diagnostic and predictive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve, confusion matrix, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using our deep CNN algorithm, based on a Keras framework in Python. RESULTS: The periapical radiographic dataset was split into training (n=1,044), validation (n=348), and test (n=348) datasets. With the deep learning algorithm, the diagnostic accuracy for PCT was 81.0% for premolars and 76.7% for molars. Using 64 premolars and 64 molars that were clinically diagnosed as severe PCT, the accuracy of predicting extraction was 82.8% (95% CI, 70.1%-91.2%) for premolars and 73.4% (95% CI, 59.9%-84.0%) for molars. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the deep CNN algorithm was useful for assessing the diagnosis and predictability of PCT. Therefore, with further optimization of the PCT dataset and improvements in the algorithm, a computer-aided detection system can be expected to become an effective and efficient method of diagnosing and predicting PCT.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oral Surgery
Oral SurgeryDentistry