PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Discover Sustainability· 2026Q1

Socio-economic importance and biomass carbon stocks of African baobab (Adansonia digitata L.) in Northwestern Ethiopia

Shiferaw Abebe, Dejene Reda

Short summary

African baobab trees in northwestern Ethiopia store an average of 50.09 Mg C ha -1 , with homesteads holding the most (58.61 Mg C ha -1 ), but the population shows an unsustainable demographic trajectory with critically deficient juvenile regeneration.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • African baobabs are crucial for food (84.0%), income (78.5%), and medicine (72.4%) in northwestern Ethiopia.
  • Biomass carbon stocks are highest in homesteads (58.61 ± 3.12 Mg C ha -1 ) compared to agricultural parklands and natural woodlands.
  • The baobab population structure is unsustainable, with a lack of mature trees in woodlands and critically low juvenile regeneration across all land uses.
  • Primary threats include unregulated mining, agricultural expansion, wildfires, and intensive extraction.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The African baobab ( Adansonia digitata L.) provides vital economic and ecological benefits in dryland ecosystems, yet faces severe sustainability challenges. This study assessed the socio-economic importance, stand structure, and biomass carbon stock of baobab across three land-use types (homesteads, agricultural lands, and woodlands) in northwestern Ethiopia. Data were collected through household surveys ( \(\:n=352\) ), focus group discussions, and biophysical forest inventory across 72 plots ( \(\:20\;\text{m}\times\:25\;\text{m}=500\;{\text{m}}^{2}\) ). Socio-economic data were synthesized using descriptive statistics and thematic coding, while one-way ANOVA was used to evaluate variations in stand parameters and biomass carbon stocks across land-use matrices. Results revealed strong community reliance on baobab for food (84.0%), household income (78.5%), material applications (73.8%), ethnomedicine (72.4%), cultural services (45.6%) and animal fodder (21.5 \(\:\%\) ). Mean biomass carbon stocks differed significantly across land uses ( \(\:p<0.001\) ), peaking in homesteads ( \(\:58.61\pm\:3.12\;\text{Mg}\:\text{C}\:\text{ha}^{-1})\) compared to agricultural parklands ( \(48.15\pm\:2.84\;\text{Mg}\:\text{C}\:\text{ha}^{-1})\) and natural woodlands ( \(43.51\pm\:2.45\;\text{Mg}\:\text{C}\:\text{ha}^{-1}\) ). The overall mean biomass carbon stock was \(50.09\pm\:1.16\;\text{Mg}\:\text{C}\:\text{ha}^{-1}\) , corresponding to an equivalent of \(183.67\pm\:4.27\;\text{Mg}\:\text{CO}_{2}\;\text{e}\:\text{ha}^{-1}\) stored in living baobab tissue. However, size-class distributions demonstrated an unsustainable demographic trajectory. Woodlands exhibited a truncated structure completely devoid of mega-tree cohorts ( \(\:>200\;\text{cm}\) \(\:\text{DBH}\) ), whereas homesteads functioned as structural refugia for relict mature trees. Crucially, juvenile regeneration was critically deficient across all land uses. Unregulated commercial and artisanal gold mining, agricultural land expansion, recurrent wildfires, and intensive extraction were identified as the primary drivers of population degradation. Reversing this trajectory requires institutionalizing community-led assisted natural regeneration, establishing spatial mining buffers, enforcing sustainable harvesting, and integrating germplasm nurseries into national frameworks like the Green Legacy initiatives.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Discover Sustainability, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

ForestryAgricultural and Biological Sciences